This page lists the people who were involved with this knowledge study and shows in what capacity they were involved.
There were 6 people directly involved with this knowledge study. An additional person has been assigned to the knowledge area.
Of the 7 people associated with this knowledge resource, 5 have expertise in at least one of the knowledge areas.
Experts have been identified for 105 knowledge nodes.
The highest person risk to the knowledge resource is .50
The table below identifies all people assigned to the knowledge study. Selecting a person provides more information about that person.
Person | Risk | External | Interviewee | Leader | Manager | Analyst | Responsible for | Capable in | Expert in |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C R Green | 0.0 |
Int |
--- |
Yes |
Yes |
--- |
1 |
0 |
0 |
N S Jones | .21 |
Int |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
0 |
54 |
7 |
A A Pendragon | .37 |
Ext |
Yes |
--- |
--- |
--- |
5 |
26 |
49 |
S P Evans | .42 |
Int |
Yes |
--- |
--- |
--- |
7 |
54 |
32 |
E N Roberts | .30 |
Int |
Yes |
--- |
--- |
--- |
8 |
54 |
60 |
M A Smith | .50 |
Int |
Yes |
--- |
Yes |
--- |
8 |
49 |
81 |
J L Gordon | 0.0 |
Int |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Yes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
One of the people listed is not directly employed by this company.
The following knowledge elements have the most negative knowledge gaps of: -7