Know how to evaluate the components of an outcome to see the features that are unattractive to the objectives of the negotiation and may lead to further problems in the future.
The parameters table shown here provides the raw data elicited during map construction. It also includes the basic analytical values for this specific knowledge item.
Identifier | Name | Value | Clarifier | Weight | Study Mean | Family Average |
P1 |
Importance |
9.0 |
quite critical |
0.8 |
7.30 |
8.5 |
P2 |
Complexity |
3.0 |
quite simple and mostly easy to understand |
1.0 |
6.14 |
3.0 |
P3 |
Study-Exp |
3.0 |
generally learned by study |
1.0 |
6.19 |
3.5 |
P6 |
Specialised |
3.0 |
largely generally used knowledge |
0.6 |
4.68 |
2.5 |
P8 |
Justifiable |
2.0 |
minimally justifiable knowledge |
-0.7 |
3.86 |
3.0 |
To read the table easily consider the name followed the clarifier as a basic statement for each value (row).
The numbers provide more detail.