Understand how definitions of justice can cause ambiguities when using the definitions to evaluate actions and understand how to both create and recognise these ambiguities. Also understand why ambiguity could cause the failure of justice to deliver any aims and know how to demonstrate this.
The parameters table shown here provides the raw data elicited during map construction. It also includes the basic analytical values for this specific knowledge item.
Identifier | Name | Value | Clarifier | Weight | Study Mean | Family Average |
P1 |
Importance |
7.0 |
rather important |
1.0 |
7.12 |
7.0 |
P2 |
Justifiable |
3.0 |
slightly justifiable knowledge |
-1.0 |
4.82 |
3.0 |
P3 |
Study-Exp |
7.0 |
generally learned from experience |
1.0 |
4.45 |
7.0 |
P4 |
LearnTime |
6.0 |
3 months |
1.0 |
5.71 |
6.0 |
To read the table easily consider the name followed the clarifier as a basic statement for each value (row).
The numbers provide more detail.